As we learned on Friday, Bristol was again unsuccessful in its attempts to be crowned European Green Capital, losing out in the 2014 race to Danish Capital Copenhagen
Rather helpfully and encouragingly transparently, the European Commission's Environment department has published a document
today that outlines the conclusions of the jury in its deliberations and its opinions on all three finalists, offering a useful and informative insight behind their decision.
This is what the jury concluded
for the Bristol bid:
"Bristol impressed the Jury with its ambitious green sustainable vision, and with a variety of urban networks including NGOs, local business, academia and volunteers that are joining together to enhance and promote green growth. Bristol Green Capital Partnership is based on community ownership and involves over 200 organisations; its aim is to do more with less. Over 1,000 volunteers have been recruited to work on green projects over the last six month period alone.
Bristol’s tag line “Inspiring Change” is very appropriate in terms of links with digital media. The city is “Green-Smart-Connected”, showing a recent 70% increase in wireless technology efficiency and partnerships with leading technology companies to promote energy efficiency; connected with more than 95,000 citizens who have participated in “E-petitions” and online discussion forum as part of Bristol "E-democracy".
Bristol has clearly demonstrated its cutting edge commitment to reducing climate change since 2000. This commitment was strengthened in 2009 when Bristol joined the Covenant of Mayors and set more ambitious CO2 reduction targets than the EU and UK, to reduce emissions by 40% by 2020 and 80% by 2050 from a 2005 baseline. Bristol energy network is mobilising the whole city, together with initiatives such as Low Carbon Southwest to create a low carbon economy in the city. In addition, Bristol's policy on clean air and noise is commendable: the city has one of the most comprehensive air quality monitoring networks in the UK and has plans to manage transport to improve air quality and reduce noise. This could be a good opportunity for Bristol to be even more proactive with its commuters. Indeed the effects of these green policies are obvious for the city itself but seem less substantial at the level of the region. Regional integration could be reinforced.
The city offers a number of examples where it can act as a role model to cities across Europe. For example there is a local food growing initiative in place which includes community gardening. Moreover Bristol intends to connect with the other seventeen EGCA 2014 applicant cities as a platform for best practice across Europe as part of the "Community Sparkplugs" initiative."
In conclusion: (emphasis added by me)
"The Jury underlined that Bristol had made major advances, and dramatically improved its sustainable urban development over the past decades. But further improvements could still be made, especially in areas such as water consumption. It could also do more to ensure that its actions have a wider impact on the broader region outside the city."
The document reveals that the jury came to the final conclusion that Copenhagen is "is a highly successful role model for the green economy, with an efficient communication strategy and the commitment required to develop its role as a model for Europe and beyond.
The competition for the 2015 Green Capital title
opened last week and I'm sure in the future Bristol will try to win, at the third attempt. But in light of the jury's comments it may be worth holding off a submission for a couple of years. Judging by the jury's comments and recent tweet (below), there is one thing for sure: Bristol has a strong position and is certainly moving in the right direction
In their most recent newsletter
, the Bristol Green Capital Bid team have announced they will discuss whether to enter the competition for a third time in this coming cycle at the next Momentum Group meeting to be held on 17th July. More information and registration details can be found here